Somoza v. Allstate Indemnity Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a verdict awarding only medical expenses does not require a new trial as a matter of law where there is a dispute as to whether the injuries suffered resulted from the accident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Francis-Harbin v. Sensormatic Electronics
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-04-25· cited 3×
• Geico General Insurance Co. v. Cirillo-Meijer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-08· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Beauvais v. Edell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-06-07· cited 16×
• Allstate Ins. Co. v. Rush
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-12-27· cited 13×
• ALLSTATE INS. CO., INC. v. Campbell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-23· cited 9×
• State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Vecchio
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-10· cited 8×
• Galante v. USAA Casualty Ins. Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-06-04· cited 6×