Beauvais v. Edell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a verdict awarding only medical expenses does not require a new trial as a matter of law
• holding that a motion directed to the inadequacy of a verdict awarding past medical expenses but no past non-economic damages is left to the broad discretion of the trial judge
• “[A] motion directed to the inadequacy, whether it seeks a[n] additur or a new trial, is left to the broad discretion of the trial judge.”
• “[Wjhere there-is a dispute as to whether the injuries resulted from the accident, a verdict awarding only [past] medical expenses does not require a new trial as a matter of law.”
• Farmer, J., concurring and noting that the verdict \implicitly\ found a permanent injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).