Somers v. AAA Temporary Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is generally accepted that where the plaintiff asserts a valid cause of action, [the plaintiffs] motive in bringing the action is immaterial.”
• “It is generally accepted that where the plaintiff asserts a valid cause of action, [plaintiffs] motive in bringing the action is immaterial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lussier v. Mau-Van Development, Inc. I
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1983-07-21· cited 59×
• Nika v. Danz
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-06-28· cited 52×
• Kobashigawa v. Silva.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2013-04-26· cited 22×
• Paulek v. Isgar
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1976-06-03· cited 5×
• Kobashigawa v. Silva
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2011-12-02· cited 3×
• Kern v. Arlington Ridge Pathology, S.C.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-08-07· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Galler v. Galler
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1965-01-21· cited 54×
• People, ex rel. Wildi v. Ittner
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1911-11-11· cited 6×
• Mexican Asphalt Co. v. Mexican Asphalt Paving Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1895-12-30· cited 5×
• Telvision Laboratories, Inc. v. Schwalm
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1961-02-28· cited 1×
• Steinweg v. Antiseptol Liquid Soap Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1912-03-14· cited 1×