Lussier v. Mau-Van Development, Inc. I

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, generally, even after the denial of a motion in limine, a party must still object to the admission of evidence at trial
• stating that “[i]t is well-settled that an appeal from a final judgment brings up for appellate review all interlocutory orders dealing with issues in the case not appeal-able directly as of right”
• stating that \[i]t is well-settled that an appeal from a final judgment brings up for appellate review all interlocutory orders dealing with issues in the case not appealable directly as of right\
• \A corporate director or officer occupies a fiduciary capacity.\ (Internal quotation marks, brackets, and citations omitted.)
• “A corporate director or officer occupies a fiduciary capacity.” (Internal quotation marks, brackets, and citations omitted.)
• \A corporate director or officer occupies a fiduciary capacity.\ (Internal quotation marks, brackets, and citations omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).