Solon v. Slater
Citations
- 345 Conn. 794
Syllabus
The plaintiff sought to recover damages from the defendants, C, the son of the plaintiff's deceased husband (M), and S, M's longtime friend and attorney, for, inter alia, tortious interference with contractual relations, in connection with the plaintiff and M's antenuptial agreement, and tortious interference with the plaintiff's right of inheritance from M's estate. The antenuptial agreement provided the plaintiff with a life estate in certain real property in Stamford, where the plaintiff and M had resided. Six months after their marriage, M was diagnosed with cancer. Before undergoing palliative surgery, M signed his first will, which was prepared by S. The plaintiff alleged that, the day after signing that will, M gave her a handwritten note memorializing certain discussions that they purportedly had had about amending the antenuptial agreement to provide that the plaintiff be left certain of M's assets, including the Stamford home and two bank accounts, upon M's death. The plaintiff and M both engaged family law attorneys to represent them in negotiating the changes to the antenuptial agreement, but they never amended the agreement. After M's surgery, M executed a second will, which was prepared by an estate planning attorney. The second will did not reflect the proposed changes to the antenuptial agreement but, instead, placed M's residuary estate into a revocable trust that benefited his two adult children from a prior marriage, including C. Thereafter, M left the Stam- ford home he shared with the plaintiff and went to stay at his former wife's home, where M remained until his death. Thereafter, S submitted an application to the Probate Court for the admission of the second will. The plaintiff objected on the grounds that, when M executed the second will, he lacked testamentary capacity and was under the defen- dants' undue influence. The Probate Court admitted the second will to probate, finding that there was insufficient evidence to support either of the
Judges: Robinson; McDonald; D’Auria; Mullins; Ecker; Keller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court· 1985-04-22· cited 1,589×
- Appleton v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-08-15· cited 636×
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-08-20· cited 257×
- Solomon v. AbermanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-06-04· cited 185×
- Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-04-06· cited 128×
- Connecticut National Bank v. RytmanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-05-20· cited 93×
- Powell v. Infinity InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-05-29· cited 81×
- Gladysz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-05-22· cited 70×
- Gaynor v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-09-03· cited 67×
- Rocco v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-04-27· cited 67×
- Weiss v. WeissSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-07-20· cited 66×
- Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. Connecticut Siting CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-03-18· cited 61×
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-07-28· cited 52×
- Palmer v. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1971-02-23· cited 42×
- Dinan v. MarchandSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-08-22· cited 38×
- Macdermid, Inc. v. LeonettiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-05-15· cited 37×
- Connecticut Natural Gas Corp. v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-11-26· cited 37×
- Daoust v. McWilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-08-11· cited 33×
- American Diamond Exchange, Inc. v. AlpertConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-05-08· cited 32×
- Weizmann Institute of Science v. NeschisS.D. New York· 2002-10-03· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.