Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 10/31/1997
Solomon v. Solomon
Citations
- 118 Md. App. 96
- 701 A.2d 1199
- 1997 Md. App. LEXIS 161
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]e perceive no abuse of discretion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kent Island, LLC v. DiNapoliCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-02-22· cited 16×
- Gestl v. FrederickCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-07-03· cited 14×
- Apenyo v. ApenyoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-12-02· cited 6×
- Poole v. Bureau of Support Enforcement Ex Rel. RoebuckCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-08-28· cited 3×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Roll and SchollCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1973-01-17· cited 117×
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-05-06· cited 43×
- Johnson v. G.D. Searle & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-01-18· cited 30×
- Winter v. CrowleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1967-02-08· cited 29×
- Harris v. MelnickCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-01-19· cited 17×
- Cronin v. CamilleriCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-10-21· cited 9×
- Rypma v. StehrCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-07-09· cited 5×
- Hare v. HareCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-04-22· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.