· 12/30/1958
Sodak Distributing Company v. Wayne
Citations
- 93 N.W.2d 791
- 77 S.D. 496
- 1958 S.D. LEXIS 46
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[i]t is likewise conceded that the rule in this state does not permit a single cause of action to be split or divided among several suits.”
- stating that \[i]t is likewise conceded that the rule in this state does not permit a single cause of action to be split or divided among several suits.\
- “Privity does not arise from the mere fact that persons as litigants are interested in the same question or in proving or disproving the same state of facts.”
- “Privity does not arise from the mere fact that persons as litigants are interested in the same question or in proving or disproving the same state of facts.”
- “Privity does not arise from the mere fact that persons as litigants are interested in the same question or in proving or disproving the same state of facts.”
- “Privity does not arise from the mere fact that persons as litigants are interested in the same question or in proving or disproving the same state of facts.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rentto
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.