Skip to main content
· 12/30/1958

Sodak Distributing Company v. Wayne

Citations

  • 93 N.W.2d 791
  • 77 S.D. 496
  • 1958 S.D. LEXIS 46

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[i]t is likewise conceded that the rule in this state does not permit a single cause of action to be split or divided among several suits.”
  • stating that \[i]t is likewise conceded that the rule in this state does not permit a single cause of action to be split or divided among several suits.\
  • “Privity does not arise from the mere fact that persons as litigants are interested in the same question or in proving or disproving the same state of facts.”
  • “Privity does not arise from the mere fact that persons as litigants are interested in the same question or in proving or disproving the same state of facts.”
  • “Privity does not arise from the mere fact that persons as litigants are interested in the same question or in proving or disproving the same state of facts.”
  • “Privity does not arise from the mere fact that persons as litigants are interested in the same question or in proving or disproving the same state of facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rentto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.