S.D. Ohio· 1/21/1999
Socks-Brunot v. Hirschvogel Inc.
Citations
- 184 F.R.D. 113
- 51 Fed. R. Serv. 515
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 626
- 1999 WL 38634
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Generally, evidence admissible for one purpose but inadmissible for another may be heard by a jury, pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 105.”
- Rule 412 applicable to a Title VII plaintiff's statements to co-workers about a sexual relationship with former supervisor at prior place of employment
- Rule 412 applicable to a Title VII plaintiffs statements to co-workers about a sexual relationship with former supervisor at prior place of employment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sargus
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.