Skip to main content
S.D. Ohio· 1/21/1999

Socks-Brunot v. Hirschvogel Inc.

Citations

  • 184 F.R.D. 113
  • 51 Fed. R. Serv. 515
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 626
  • 1999 WL 38634

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Generally, evidence admissible for one purpose but inadmissible for another may be heard by a jury, pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 105.”
  • Rule 412 applicable to a Title VII plaintiff's statements to co-workers about a sexual relationship with former supervisor at prior place of employment
  • Rule 412 applicable to a Title VII plaintiffs statements to co-workers about a sexual relationship with former supervisor at prior place of employment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sargus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.