Skip to main content

Smothers v. State

Citations

  • 38 Ala. App. 553
  • 89 So. 2d 277
  • 1956 Ala. App. LEXIS 244

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The allegation being a mere surplusage, and not being descriptive of the offense, nor material to jurisdiction, need not be proved.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harwood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.