Cauley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the allegation in the indictment asserting the value of stolen cow was not descriptive of the offense, was properly regarded as surplusage, and proof thereof was not necessary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pardue v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1989-09-29· cited 50×
• Britton v. State
  Alabama Court of Appeals· 1917-03-23· cited 38×
• Lunceford v. City of Northport
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1988-11-10· cited 18×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1989-06-30· cited 16×
• Fitch v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2001-08-31· cited 7×
• Maxwell v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1986-02-25· cited 2×
• Smothers v. State
  Alabama Court of Appeals· 1956-08-14· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Stedman
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1838-06-15· cited 16×