Skip to main content
· 6/8/1983

Smithson v. Nordstrom, Inc.

Citations

  • 664 P.2d 1119
  • 63 Or. App. 423
  • 118 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3019
  • 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 2937

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prolonged interrogation without evidence of wrongdoing, culminated by a coerced confession of theft and a termination of the employee
  • where employee was interrogated for three hours about suspected theft and was threatened with prosecution on scanty evidence if she did not sign a confession, there was sufficient evidence to generate a jury question on issue of outrageous conduct
  • where employee was interrogated for three hours about suspected theft and was threatened with prosecution on scanty evidence if she did not sign a confession, there was sufficient evidence to generate a jury question on issue of outrageous conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buttler, Warren, Rossman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.