Skip to main content
· 4/4/1997

Smith v. Young (In Re Young)

Citations

  • 208 B.R. 189
  • 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 975
  • 1997 WL 192188

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The conceptual difficulty attending such a fine differentiation, however, leads courts to typically ignore the 23 negligible difference between the two phrases.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John L. Peterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.