Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 5/1/1987

Smith v. White

Citations

  • 815 F.2d 1401
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 5630

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding remand was not required when the habeas petitioner “completely failed to present any evidence at the evidentiary hearing” showing that his attorney had an actual conflict of interest
  • concluding remand was not required when the habeas petitioner “completely failed to present any evidence at the evidentiary hearing” showing that his attorney had an actual conflict of interest
  • concluding remand was not required when the habeas petitioner “completely failed to present any evidence at the evidentiary hearing” showing that his attorney had an actual conflict of interest
  • the petitioner “completely failed to present any evidence at the evidentiary hearing showing that [former counsel] in fact learned any relevant confidential information during his prior representation”; the petitioner’s “conclusory allegation” in his brief was “inadequate” to carry his burden

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.