Kenneth Darcell Quince v. James Crosby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “while habeas relief is available to address defects in a criminal defendant's conviction and sentence, an alleged defect in a collateral proceeding does not state a basis for habeas relief”
• stating that the state post-conviction judge’s conflict of interest could have been a basis for arguing that the state post-conviction proceeding was not “full and fair”
• “[A]n alleged defect in a collateral proceeding does not state a basis for habeas relief.”
• “[A]n alleged defect in a collateral proceeding does not state a basis for habeas relief.”
• “[T]he district court was correct in . . . declining to grant habeas relief based on Judge Johnson’s refusal to recuse himself from the Rule 3.850 hearing.”
• “[W]hile habeas relief is available to address defects in a criminal defendant’s conviction and sentence, an alleged defect in a collateral proceeding does not state a basis for habeas relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).