Skip to main content

Smith v. Vencare, Inc.

Citations

  • 519 S.E.2d 735
  • 238 Ga. App. 621
  • 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 2599
  • 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 889

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where there is some evidence to rebut claim of an element of privilege, summary judgment is improper
  • \trial court must exercise its sound discretion in allowing the addition of parties\
  • “where there is an actual corporation by the same name as the alleged misnomer, there is no simple correction of the name as a misnomer . . . because the plaintiff has sued the wrong corporate entity”
  • “where there is an actual corporation by the same name as the alleged misnomer, there is no simple correction of the name as a misnomer . . . because the plaintiff has sued the wrong corporate entity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eldridge, Pope, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.