Bishop v. Farhat

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff need not obtain leave of court to add a party under OCGA § 9-11-21 “when a plaintiff seeks to substitute a named defendant for a ‘John Doe.’”
• concluding that a seller of latex gloves was unentitled to summary judgment on a negligent failure-to-warn claim based on evidence that the seller had received complaints about other brands of latex gloves and based on medical literature documenting the dangers of latex allergies
• summary judgment in favor of distributor of medical gloves used by non-purchasing nurse held improper
• summary judgment in favor of distributor of medical gloves used by non-purchasing nurse held improper
• OCGA § 9-11-15 (c) is the procedure \by which the trial court determines whether the amended complaint 'relates back' to a filing within the statute of limitation.\
• product seller required to warn if it “has knowledge, or by the application of reasonable, developed human skill and foresight should have knowledge of the danger” created by its product

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).