Supreme Court· 1/19/1831
Smith v. United States
Citations
- 30 U.S. 292
- 8 L. Ed. 130
- 5 Pet. 292
- 1831 U.S. LEXIS 354
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The legislature may establish new rules of evidence, in derogation of the common law, but the judicial power is limited to the rule laid down.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: M'lean
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bruce v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1855-02-14· cited 45×
- Celanese Corporation of America and Federal Insurance Company v. Vandalia Warehouse CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1970-04-15· cited 38×
- Harris v. Doe, on the Demise of BarnettIndiana Supreme Court· 1837-11-30· cited 21×
- State v. GustafsonWisconsin Supreme Court· 1985-01-03· cited 19×
- Carter v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-03-26· cited 16×
- Miller v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-03-31· cited 12×
- Soule v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1879-11-10· cited 11×
- Cutts & Johnson v. HardeeSupreme Court of Georgia· 1868-12-15· cited 10×
- Rockbridge Associates, Ltd. v. PruittN.D. Georgia· 1971-09-30· cited 6×
- Harvey v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1899-10-09· cited 3×
- United States v. National Bank of the RepublicDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1883-03-13
- United States v. PiersonEighth Circuit· 1906-04-23
- A.H. v. N.Y. State Dep't of HealthSecond Circuit· 2025-08-13
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.