Skip to main content
· 2/17/1929

Soule v. United States

Citations

  • 16 Ct. Cust. 524
  • 1929 WL 28296
  • 1929 CCPA LEXIS 23

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Ohio law and rejecting contention that a jury finding for defendant under the risk-benefit test implies that jury would have also found for defendant under consumer-benefit test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bland, Graham, Hatfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.