· 2/17/1929
Soule v. United States
Citations
- 16 Ct. Cust. 524
- 1929 WL 28296
- 1929 CCPA LEXIS 23
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying Ohio law and rejecting contention that a jury finding for defendant under the risk-benefit test implies that jury would have also found for defendant under consumer-benefit test
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bland, Graham, Hatfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.