District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 5/1/1992
Smith v. United States
Citations
- 608 A.2d 129
- 1992 D.C. App. LEXIS 115
- 1992 WL 89153
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that hearing was necessary when attorney failed to contact or call witnesses who would have impeached government witnesses even if any individual witness could not have entirely confirmed defendant's version of incident
- reversing trial court’s denial of § 23-110 motion without a hearing, where trial court ruled on basis of motion, “files and records of the case,” and appellant’s “additional submissions in support of his motion”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Ferren, Steadman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Newman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-09-09· cited 70×
- Ready v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-02-05· cited 58×
- Jeffrey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-02-16· cited 31×
- Spencer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-01-23· cited 23×
- Garmon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-10-17· cited 20×
- Gray v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-12-08· cited 19×
- McKinnon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-07-07· cited 17×
- Head v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-06-10· cited 12×
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-03-30· cited 5×
- Saudi American Public Relations Affairs Committee v. Institute for Gulf AffairsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2020-12-10
- Shepherd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2023-06-22
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Ramsey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-01-19· cited 68×
- Pettaway v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-07-27· cited 64×
- Gibson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-06-30· cited 61×
- MacK v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-02-23· cited 56×
- Curry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-09-09· cited 56×
- McAdoo v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-09-24· cited 45×
- McClurkin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-01-31· cited 43×
- Gaston v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-04-07· cited 31×
- Ellerbe v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-05-13· cited 28×
- Rice v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-09-21· cited 26×
- Simpson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-06-22· cited 17×
- Hill v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-03-22· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.