District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 12/8/1992
Gray v. United States
Citations
- 617 A.2d 521
- 1992 D.C. App. LEXIS 305
- 1992 WL 365735
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that hearing was necessary to determine whether trial counsel investigated witness who would have contradicted government's witness regarding defendant's presence at scene of crime
- concluding that hearing was necessary to determine whether trial counsel investigated witness who would have contradicted government’s witness regarding defendant’s presence at scene of crime
- “At the very least … the trial court should have taken testimony from [the appellant’s] trial counsel . . . .” before concluding trial counsel’s failure to investigate a witness was a reasonable tactical decision
- “At the very least … the trial court should have taken testimony from [the appellant’s] trial counsel . . . .” before concluding trial counsel’s failure to investigate a witness was a reasonable tactical decision
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Ferren, Terry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Newman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-09-09· cited 70×
- Ready v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-02-05· cited 58×
- Lane v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-09-09· cited 29×
- Long v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-11-09· cited 26×
- Bruce v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-12-18· cited 18×
- Geddie v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-08-14· cited 16×
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-03-15· cited 13×
- Reaves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-05-08· cited 13×
- Head v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-06-10· cited 12×
- Forte v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-07-22· cited 11×
- Upshur v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-12-30· cited 4×
- Aiken v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-09-11· cited 3×
- Parker & Jenkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2021-04-22
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Ramsey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-01-19· cited 68×
- Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-03-26· cited 67×
- Pettaway v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-07-27· cited 64×
- Gibson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-06-30· cited 61×
- Sykes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-01-28· cited 43×
- Miller v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-06-29· cited 41×
- Woody v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1977-02-10· cited 36×
- White v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-11-26· cited 35×
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-03-29· cited 29×
- Gillis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-02-20· cited 26×
- Session v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1977-12-14· cited 19×
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-05-01· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.