Smith v. Thigpen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• parol evidence was admissible to resolve an ambiguity as to the specific nature of consideration supporting a promissory note given “for value received” without specifying the consideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Nash v. Township Investments, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-03-19· cited 2×
• Carolyn Ann Lewis v. Paul B. Ikner
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-03-21
• Norman J. Nash v. Township Investments, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-03-19
• TYLER BERRYHILL v. MIGUEL LOPEZ
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2026-01-07

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1986-05-28· cited 517×
• Deep South Services, Inc. v. Wade
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1981-09-08· cited 13×
• Leiter v. Arnold
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1966-09-22· cited 5×
• Hawkins v. National City Mortgage Co.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-07-05· cited 3×