Skip to main content
· 6/26/2009

Smith v. Thigpen

Citations

  • 680 S.E.2d 604
  • 298 Ga. App. 572
  • 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2288
  • 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 721

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • parol evidence was admissible to resolve an ambiguity as to the specific nature of consideration supporting a promissory note given “for value received” without specifying the consideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Andrews, Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.