· 6/26/2009
Smith v. Thigpen
Citations
- 680 S.E.2d 604
- 298 Ga. App. 572
- 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2288
- 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 721
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- parol evidence was admissible to resolve an ambiguity as to the specific nature of consideration supporting a promissory note given “for value received” without specifying the consideration
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miller, Andrews, Barnes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.