Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying a petition for a writ of mandamus where the defendant’s counsel “represent[ed] that he ha[d] no such documents.”
• “The petitioner is entitled to receive from his former counsel, at no cost to petitioner, any and all trial and hearing transcripts, copies of motions, and any state discovery presented to defense counsel.”
• “The petitioner is entitled to receive from his former counsel, at no cost to petitioner, any and all trial and hearing transcripts, copies of motions, and any state discover presented to defense counsel”
• “The petitioner is entitled to receive from his former counsel, at no cost to petitioner, any and all trial and hearing transcripts, copies of motions, and any state discovery presented to defense counsel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Morse v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-22· cited 2×
• Roland v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-08-14· cited 1×
• JAMES LEE ANTHONY, JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-07-19
• Rojas v. Office of Public Defender
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-12-21
• LUIS A. GOMEZ v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-01-26

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Potts v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-26· cited 20×