District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/26/2004
Potts v. State
Citations
- 869 So. 2d 1223
- 2004 WL 592650
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “transcripts that were prepared at public expense on behalf of an indigent defendant must be provided to the defendant without charge for copying”
- noting that indigent defendants are entitled, at no cost, to copies of any documents produced at public expense
- stating that attorney files prepared for the purpose of representing a client are the attorney's personal property, but that a defendant is entitled to the return of personal property that he provided to counsel and transcripts prepared on his behalf at public expense
- “Mandamus is the appropriate remedy since it is used to compel an official to perform lawful duties. A court- appointed lawyer is an ‘official.’” (citation omitted)
- “Mandamus is the appropriate remedy since it is used to compel an official to perform lawful duties. A court-appointed lawyer is an ‘official.’ ” (quoting Pearce v. Sheffey, 647 So.2d 333, 333 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994))
- \Mandamus is the appropriate remedy since it is used to compel an official to perform lawful duties. A court-appointed lawyer is an 'official.' \ (quoting Pearce v. Sheffey, 647 So. 2d 333, 333 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Silberman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rosado v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-01-21· cited 11×
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-08-08· cited 10×
- Raymond v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-04-09· cited 5×
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-29· cited 5×
- LaFlower v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-12· cited 4×
- Harrell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-29· cited 3×
- Degregorio v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-11-23· cited 3×
- ALBERTO ROMERO GONZALEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-02-23· cited 3×
- Vann v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-05-06· cited 3×
- Zito v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-09-26· cited 2×
- Morse v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-22· cited 2×
- Hawkins v. GardnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-04-07· cited 1×
- Wharen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-07-31· cited 1×
- Radford v. BrockDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-01
- JAMES LEE ANTHONY, JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-07-19
- Rojas v. Office of Public DefenderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-12-21
- Bernal v. WeinstockDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-11-14
- MERLIN HOWARD v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-01-19
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-03-12· cited 31×
- Thompson v. UnterbergerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-04-05· cited 18×
- Pearce v. SheffeyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-12-28· cited 15×
- Colon v. IrwinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-30· cited 12×
- Long v. DillingerSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-11-13· cited 8×
- Woodson v. DurocherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-10-24· cited 6×
- Sanford v. BlackDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-20· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.