Court of Appeals of Texas· 11/7/1997
Smith v. State
Citations
- 957 S.W.2d 881
- 1997 Tex. App. LEXIS 5789
- 1997 WL 691093
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant waived error by admitting “that everything said . . . was true”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-01-31· cited 5,788×
- Geesa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-11-06· cited 2,157×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-12-18· cited 2,034×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-10-13· cited 1,078×
- DeGarmo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-03-13· cited 224×
- Beltran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-04-15· cited 115×
- Cook v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1997-03-17· cited 47×
- Williams v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1996-09-12· cited 44×
- Sweeten v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-07-17· cited 34×
- Moncrief v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-04-16· cited 25×
- Barrett v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 1995-05-03· cited 23×
- Verell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1988-03-24· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.