Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because Mr. Smith was convicted of a sex offense, he cannot have his firearm rights restored.”
• “Because Mr. Smith was convicted of a sex offense, he cannot have his firearm rights restored. RCW 9.41.040(4).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Masangkay
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-06-07· cited 9×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-09-18· cited 6×
• State v. Hunter
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-10-20· cited 6×
• Austin J. Benson v. State Of Washington
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2018-06-05· cited 4×
• State v. R.P.H.
  Washington Supreme Court· 2011-12-01· cited 4×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rozner v. City of Bellevue
  Washington Supreme Court· 1991-01-31· cited 194×
• Berger v. Sonneland
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-07-05· cited 186×
• Western Telepage, Inc. v. City of Tacoma
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-05-11· cited 166×
• Western Telepage, Inc. v. City of Tacoma Department of Financing
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-05-11· cited 164×
• Everett Concrete Products, Inc. v. Department of Labor & Industries
  Washington Supreme Court· 1988-01-21· cited 105×
• In RE DILLENBURG v. Maxwell
  Washington Supreme Court· 1966-04-28· cited 83×
• Mahona-Jojanto, Inc., NSL v. Bank of New Mexico
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1968-07-08· cited 22×
• State v. Argueta
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-07-23· cited 21×
• Bates v. City of Richland
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-08-06· cited 20×