Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 340 S.W.3d 41
  • 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 1739
  • 2011 WL 837161

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating, as part of harm analysis, that when indictment was read, defendant “did not object to the phrasing of the indictment or claim he lacked notice”
  • pointing out complainant did not know dates of sexual abuse but testified it occurred during summer of 2007 until December 2007 when her twin siblings were two-weeks-old
  • pointing out complainant did not know dates of sexual abuse but testified it occurred during summer of 2007 until December 2007 when her twin siblings were two-weeks-old

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elsa Alcala

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

79 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.