Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 717 S.E.2d 280
  • 311 Ga. App. 757
  • 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 3004
  • 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 841

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the victim was disabled when she read at a first or second-grade level, did not understand monetary denominations, needed help with feminine hygiene, had an IQ well below 70, and generally could not care for herself
  • holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the victim was disabled when she read at a first or second-grade level, did not understand monetary denominations, needed help with feminine hygiene, had an IQ well below 70, and generally could not care for herself
  • holding that vagueness argument was moot
  • count of indictment charging defendant with incest for having sexual relations with adoptive sister, with whom he had no blood relationship, was insufficient as a matter of law because incest statute expressly applies only to siblings of the whole blood or the half blood
  • count of 6 indictment charging defendant with incest for having sexual relations with adoptive sister, with whom he had no blood relationship, was insufficient as a matter of law because incest statute expressly applies only to siblings of the whole blood or the half blood

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Andrews, Phipps, McFadden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.