Mashoko Woods v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing “uncertainty as to the precise date on which the Attorney General of the United States specified that SORNA would apply to pre-enactment offenders”
• discussing SORNA’s enactment and recognizing SORNA became effective when the final rules and regulations were published August 1, 2008
• involving an offender who sought relief in 2016 from a 1991 conviction
• Petrovick’s 15-year registration period under SORNA began to run when the circuit court issued its judgment accepting his guilty plea and placing him on probation.
• “If Petrovick was ever subject to an obligation to register under SORNA, th[at] would trigger his obligation to register under the state SORA statute.”
• Article I, § 13 of the Missouri Constitution “does not prohibit the application of [MO-]SORA to those individuals who are or have been subject to the independent registration requirements of SORNA.” (quoting Doe v. Toelke, 389 S.W.3d 165, 167 (Mo. banc 2012)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).