Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2/16/1977
Smith v. State
Citations
- 547 S.W.2d 6
- 1977 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 960
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining a confession is not involuntary if there was a break in the stream of events from the initial coercion to the giving of the confession
- FBI agent who conducted interview did not know whether New Orleans officers, who had custody of the defendant, had engaged in abusive or threatening behavior
- “[Appellant’s] contention must be sustained because his allegations of coercion were not rebutted by the State.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Odom, Douglas, Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bonham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-11-21· cited 331×
- Bates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-01-10· cited 164×
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-10-09· cited 147×
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-04-21· cited 132×
- Bush v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-02-03· cited 120×
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-10-07· cited 108×
- Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-06-24· cited 64×
- Saunders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-10-25· cited 61×
- Barton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-10-08· cited 57×
- Espinosa v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1995-06-01· cited 48×
- Reeves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-06-07· cited 18×
- Eric Ramirez v. State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2002-04-12· cited 17×
- Gaines v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1990-03-06· cited 12×
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-06-08· cited 12×
- McBride v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1991-04-03· cited 9×
- Howeth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1982-06-16· cited 5×
- Ortega v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1983-03-23· cited 5×
- Chavez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1982-10-20· cited 4×
- Carr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1987-11-12· cited 4×
- Parr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1993-09-30· cited 4×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 2,732×
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1963-05-27· cited 1,403×
- Payne v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1958-05-19· cited 840×
- Milton v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 824×
- Albrecht v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-09-25· cited 705×
- Clewis v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 543×
- Beecher v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1967-10-23· cited 283×
- Sims v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 242×
- Farr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-03-12· cited 79×
- Lynnwell Smith v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsFifth Circuit· 1976-02-20· cited 46×
- Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-01-10· cited 46×
- Sherman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-02-18· cited 42×
- Spaulding v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-03-06· cited 35×
- United States v. PileSupreme Court· 1889-04-01· cited 21×
- Prine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-05-29· cited 20×
- Waffer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-10-17· cited 17×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-07-11· cited 12×
- Akridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-05-09· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.