Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 874 S.W.2d 269
  • 1994 Tex. App. LEXIS 673
  • 1994 WL 106307

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the defense of necessity was raised by evidence that (1
  • “An ‘imminent harm’ occurs when there is an emergency situation, and it is ‘immediately necessary’ to avoid that harm when a split-second decision is required without time to consider the law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Murphy, Ellis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.