Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 929 N.E.2d 255
  • 2010 Ind. App. LEXIS 1150
  • 2010 WL 2605232

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that the trial court was not obligated to consider Smith’s cooperation with the police as a mitigating factor because it could have been based on pragmatism
  • affirming defendant’s sentence after observing that defendant’s “poor decision-making” during offenses was due to “voluntary intoxication on drugs”
  • finding no abuse of the trial court’s sentencing discretion where Smith failed to show his diminished mental capacity limited his ability to function or had a nexus with the crime
  • cooperation was a pragmatic decision made only after arrest and not entitled to mitigating weight
  • trial court did not abuse its discretion when aggravators supported by the record
  • no abuse of discretion where record supported trial court’s findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: May

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.