Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• this Court concluded, “[T]he trial court’s finding that the second evaluation was in substantial compliance with and fulfilled the purposes of the evaluation procedures is not clearly erroneous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Grievance of Beville v. University of South Dakota/South Dakota Board of Regents
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-02-10· cited 23×
• Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. Halverson
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-07-31· cited 21×
• Wheeler v. State
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-06-05· cited 16×
• Ratajczak v. Ratajczak
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-06-24· cited 11×
• Hom v. State
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-08-09· cited 11×
• Cuozzo v. State, d/b/a University of North Dakota
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-04-11· cited 7×
• Nastrom v. Nastrom
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-09-15· cited 5×
• State v. Baatz
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-10-18· cited 4×
• State v. Nickel
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-10-18· cited 2×
• In Re Diocese of Bismarck Trust
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-09-12· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Piacitelli v. Southern Utah State College
  Utah Supreme Court· 1981-09-18· cited 58×
• Stensrud v. Mayville State College
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-05-22· cited 36×
• Hulse v. Schelkopf
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1985-08-02· cited 35×
• State v. Beloit Concrete Stone Co.
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1981-06-25· cited 18×
• Burke v. Angies, Inc
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1985-06-19· cited 16×