· 8/9/1990
Hom v. State
Citations
- 459 N.W.2d 823
- 1990 N.D. LEXIS 177
- 1990 WL 114237
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- this Court concluded, “The trial court’s finding of substantial compliance was induced by its erroneous determination of the primary purpose of the regulation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Meschke, Erickstad, Levine, Vande Walle Gierke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.