Skip to main content
· 8/9/1990

Hom v. State

Citations

  • 459 N.W.2d 823
  • 1990 N.D. LEXIS 177
  • 1990 WL 114237

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • this Court concluded, “The trial court’s finding of substantial compliance was induced by its erroneous determination of the primary purpose of the regulation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meschke, Erickstad, Levine, Vande Walle Gierke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.