Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• miscommunication not a tenable foundation for due process claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Thurman v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1993-08-31· cited 30×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1989-11-30· cited 15×
• Norwood v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1989-02-23· cited 5×
• State v. Walden
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1992-10-08· cited 3×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Almanza v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-02-27· cited 6,557×
• Crocker v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-05-10· cited 336×
• Tarpley v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-05-10· cited 163×
• Mendoza v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-06-08· cited 146×
• Warren v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-10-09· cited 106×
• Etchieson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-11-01· cited 105×
• Wood v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-07-19· cited 85×
• Curtis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-03-12· cited 80×
• Ross v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-11-01· cited 44×
• Rodriguez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-09-18· cited 42×
• Hawkins v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-06-22· cited 33×
• Victoria v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-05-21· cited 28×
• Gordon v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1985-01-03· cited 2×