Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that state is required to present competent evidence to prove value of stolen property at time of theft
• stating that conviction of grand theft must be supported by proof of item’s value beyond reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lucky v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-20· cited 21×
• K.W. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-06· cited 21×
• Bloodsaw v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-08· cited 16×
• A.D. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-03-24· cited 10×
• C.G. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-10-18· cited 4×
• Isaac G. Chappell, Jr. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-06-24· cited 1×
• Alvarez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-03-18· cited 1×
• KW v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-06
• William T. Martin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-11-03
• Frazier v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-03-14
• Rivera v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-10-28

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pickett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-12· cited 27×
• Evans v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-07-06· cited 20×
• Doane v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-02· cited 14×
• D.L. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-07-18· cited 7×
• J. M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-22· cited 3×
• Mulligan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-11· cited 1×