Skip to main content

C.G. v. State

Citations

  • 123 So. 3d 680
  • 2013 WL 5658318
  • 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16591

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The evidence of value was ‘not “obvious as to defy contradiction’ and, therefore, was insufficient to establish the stolen property’s value at the time of the theft.”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Evander, Orfinger, Wallis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.