District Court of Appeal of Florida· 10/18/2013
C.G. v. State
Citations
- 123 So. 3d 680
- 2013 WL 5658318
- 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16591
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The evidence of value was ‘not “obvious as to defy contradiction’ and, therefore, was insufficient to establish the stolen property’s value at the time of the theft.”’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Evander, Orfinger, Wallis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.