Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 158 S.W.3d 463
  • 2005 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 151
  • 2005 WL 236895

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that when a defendant stipulates to a prior conviction, he cannot later argue the falsity of that conviction
  • recognizing that when a defendant stipulates to a prior conviction, he cannot later argue the falsity of that conviction
  • holding that when an appellant stipulates to the existence of prior DWI convictions, he cannot later argue that the State failed, at trial, to establish the existence of the prior convictions
  • holding that when an appellant stipulates to the existence of prior DWI convictions, he cannot later argue that the State failed, at trial, to establish the existence of the prior convictions
  • Even a stipulation to a conviction that was otherwise too remote to serve as a jurisdictional predicate for a felony DWI will be enforced.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller, Price, Womack, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran, Johnson, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.