Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he independent act does not have to be identical in character to the charged offense if there is a sufficient connection between them.”
• “[T]he independent act does not have to be identical in character to the charged offense if there is a sufficient connection between them.”
• “[T]he independent act does not have to be identical in character to the charged offense if there is a sufficient connection between them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gardner v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2001-05-07· cited 61×
• Moore v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2000-10-02· cited 14×
• Spencer v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1997-06-02· cited 13×
• Thomas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-12-14· cited 11×
• Brundage v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-03-20· cited 10×
• Glaser v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2000-09-11· cited 4×
• Jimenez v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-09-10· cited 4×
• Willett v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-09-20· cited 3×
• Rolle v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-06-27· cited 2×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-10-23· cited 2×
• Manuel v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2003-06-02
• Frank Davis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-10-23

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1991-11-01· cited 827×
• Riddle v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1978-02-24· cited 35×
• Eagle v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1994-02-21· cited 28×