Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding there was no ineffective assistance where counsel had previously represented a prosecution witness because there was no current representation of conflicting interests and, if anything, the information gained from the previous representation would be used to the defendant’s advantage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cook
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2007-10-05· cited 20×
• Lamm v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2006-10-25· cited 4×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Murray v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1992-03-31· cited 392×
• Stuart v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1990-10-16· cited 262×
• Clark v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1969-03-17· cited 183×
• Pope v. Intermountain Gas Co.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1982-05-21· cited 132×
• State v. Bingham
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1989-06-15· cited 106×
• Young v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1988-11-02· cited 18×
• State v. Smith
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1993-01-04· cited 15×
• Sanders v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1990-02-02· cited 14×
• Reeves v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1983-12-08· cited 13×
• State v. Morris
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 13×
• McNeeley v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1986-06-30· cited 7×
• Ratliff v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1989-03-21· cited 6×