Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that violation of the prohibition against double jeopardy is a fundamental error which can be presented for the first time in a postconviction motion
• “[A] violation of the prohibition against double jeopardy is a fundamental error, which can be presented for the first time in a postconviction motion.” (cleaned up)
• violation of the prohibition against double jeopardy
• violation of the prohibition against double jeopardy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Haliburton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-01· cited 6×
• Waggy v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-26· cited 4×
• State v. Frances
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2001-03-27· cited 2×
• Spencer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-01· cited 2×
• Kellar v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-06-01
• Khalid Hayat Chaudhry v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-01-31

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-02-06· cited 80×
• Willie v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-05-20· cited 14×