Skip to main content

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 483 So. 2d 420
  • 11 Fla. L. Weekly 49

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the issue of prejudice was not an appropriate consideration in a rule 3.850 challenge to a double jeopardy violation
  • determining that a double-jeopardy claim is fundamental and was not waived by a guilty plea or the failure to raise it before trial
  • criminal conviction based upon defendant twice being put in jeopardy for the same offense constitutes fundamental error
  • where no record basis for modification and modification deprived defendant of livelihood, modification placed defendant in double jeopardy
  • a criminal conviction which violates the prohibition against double jeopardy constitutes fundamental error
  • increase of penalty from 90 days incarceration to 13 years

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Overton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

80 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.