Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no merit to claim that trial court abused its discretion in admitting hearsay evidence based on lack of explicit determinations that each requirement of Rule 807 was met
• “Ap- pellant cites no authority for the proposition that a trial court 9 must explicitly determine on the record that each requirement of OCGA § 24-8-807 has been met before admitting hearsay under the residual exception.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• WILLIAMS v. HARVEY
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2021-05-17· cited 36×
• Ward v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2022-02-15· cited 25×
• Siders v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2024-10-15· cited 6×
• Kelly v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2026-04-21
• Snow v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2026-05-19

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Malcolm v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1993-09-20· cited 1,049×
• Clark v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1999-04-12· cited 167×
• Davenport v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2020-07-02· cited 159×
• State v. Almanza
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2018-10-09· cited 98×
• Kemp v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2018-02-19· cited 52×
• KEMP v. THE STATE (Three Cases)
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2018-02-19· cited 50×
• State v. Holmes
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2018-10-09· cited 30×
• McWilliams v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1999-10-18· cited 8×