Smith v. Smith
Citations
- 51 S.C. 379
- 29 S.E. 227
- 1898 S.C. LEXIS 32
Syllabus
<p>1. Aeimony — Suit Money — Attorney’s Rees. — The Courts of this State will grant alimony and suit money pendente lite.</p> <p>2. Ibid. — Ibid.—Chambers.—Alimony and suit money, pendente lite, may be granted at chambers.</p> <p>3. Ibid. — Injunction.—The facts alleged in the complaint, and stated in affidavits, are not sufficient to show that plaintiff was entitled to the injunction.</p> <p>4. Injunction' — -Bond.—A written undertaking should be required upon granting an injunction. Watson v. Bank, 5 S. C., 177, explained.</p>
Judges: Gary, Pope
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re DoleHawaii Supreme Court· 1903-01-21· cited 65×
- Clark v. ClarkTennessee Supreme Court· 1925-09-06· cited 20×
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1969-11-05· cited 13×
- Bond v. BondSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1969-03-11· cited 10×
- Epps v. BRYANTSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1950-12-27· cited 6×
- Eagerton v. EagertonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-07-22· cited 6×
- Armaly v. ArmalySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-04-29· cited 5×
- Ex parte JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1931-03-31
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.