Eagerton v. Eagerton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding when there is sufficient property and a means to continue making the ordered payments, the supporting parent is called upon to use those assets even where his or her income declines
• taking into account the net wealth of the paying spouse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Patel v. Patel
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-10-31· cited 52×
• Townsend v. Townsend
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-09-29· cited 29×
• McMurtrey v. McMurtrey
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-11-21· cited 5×
• Bobo Brothers, Inc. v. South Carolina Tax Commission
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-05-17· cited 3×
• Foster v. Foster
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-01-25· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Darden v. Witham
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-10-11· cited 43×
• Stern v. Stern
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-06-29· cited 38×
• Mixson v. Mixson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1969-12-18· cited 31×
• Smith v. Smith
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1898-03-01· cited 25×
• Murphy v. Murphy
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1974-05-21· cited 16×
• Eagerton v. Eagerton
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-03-05· cited 2×