Smith v. Smith
Citations
- 15 Wash. 239
- 46 P. 249
- 1896 Wash. LEXIS 169
Syllabus
<p>WILLS — CONSTRUCTION — TRUSTEES — PROBATE JURISDICTION.</p> <p>Where trustees of the property of an estate, instead of executors, have been appointed by a will, the probate court has no jurisdiction of questions involving their management of the estate, but the same are triable in equity.</p> <p>A will devising and bequeathing to certain persons all the testator’s property, “ in trust, nevertheless, to and for the following uses and purposes,” etc., constitutes such persons trustees, though they may be denominated in the will as executors, especially when it appears from the will construed as an entirety, that such was the intent of the testator, inasmuch as a non-resident is named as one of the executors and certain trust property of the testator is included in the devise.</p>
Judges: Dunbar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Macdonald v. FraterWashington Supreme Court· 1902-08-26· cited 18×
- Moore v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court· 1898-07-12· cited 15×
- Boyer v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court· 1901-09-13· cited 15×
- Estate of Cornett v. WestWashington Supreme Court· 1918-05-08· cited 14×
- Shufeldt v. HughesWashington Supreme Court· 1909-10-11· cited 12×
- Hemrich v. HemrichWashington Supreme Court· 1921-09-16· cited 9×
- Guye v. GuyeWashington Supreme Court· 1911-04-17· cited 5×
- Finson v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas· 1912-05-11· cited 5×
- City of Seattle v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court· 1901-09-11· cited 4×
- Korsstrom v. BarnesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Washington· 1907-09-17· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.