Korsstrom v. Barnes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting claim that the designation of a substitute supplier created a monthly violation because “[i]t is legal commonplace that a cause of action accrues when a defendant commits an act that injures the plaintiff”
• Section 210 creates specific rights that were unknown to the common law of any state and would not exist in the absence of a federal statute
• date of change in credit terms from consignment arrangement to fixed payment schedule
• date of allegedly improper use of “substitute supplier rule”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).