Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/5/2017
Smith v. Smith
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 7463
Syllabus
Trial court erred by finding Husband committed financial misconduct where his uninsured business caught on fire and he was forced to take out loans to rebuild. Though Husband exercised poor judgment in his failure to maintain liability insurance on the premises, there is no evidence that Husband engaged in wrongdoing or intentionally defeated marital assets.
Judges: Ringland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bobie v. BobieOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-18· cited 9×
- Hall v. BrickerOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-09· cited 8×
- Garcia v. SamanoOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-12· cited 6×
- Smith v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-27· cited 6×
- Porter v. PorterOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-15· cited 6×
- Ehrmantrout v. EhrmantroutOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-05· cited 2×
- Williamson v. WilliamsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-05-20· cited 1×
- Smallwood v. SmallwoodOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-19
- Adams v. AdamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-22
- Williams v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-14
- Fisher v. FisherOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-06-09
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.