Skip to main content

Smith v. Smith

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 7463

Syllabus

Trial court erred by finding Husband committed financial misconduct where his uninsured business caught on fire and he was forced to take out loans to rebuild. Though Husband exercised poor judgment in his failure to maintain liability insurance on the premises, there is no evidence that Husband engaged in wrongdoing or intentionally defeated marital assets.

Judges: Ringland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.