Skip to main content

Smith v. Smith

Citations

  • 126 S.W.3d 660
  • 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 717
  • 2004 WL 115001

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \No person has a vested right in any general rule of law or policy of legislation entitling him to insist that it remain unchanged for his benefit.\
  • “No person has a vested right in any general rule of law or policy of legislation entitling him to insist that it remain unchanged for his benefit.”
  • \No person has a vested right in any general rule of law or policy of legislation entitling him to insist that it remain unchanged for his benefit.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hedges, Anderson, Guzman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.