Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1/27/2004
Smith v. Smith
Citations
- 126 S.W.3d 660
- 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 717
- 2004 WL 115001
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \No person has a vested right in any general rule of law or policy of legislation entitling him to insist that it remain unchanged for his benefit.\
- “No person has a vested right in any general rule of law or policy of legislation entitling him to insist that it remain unchanged for his benefit.”
- \No person has a vested right in any general rule of law or policy of legislation entitling him to insist that it remain unchanged for his benefit.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hedges, Anderson, Guzman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court· 2002-04-11· cited 1,966×
- Murff v. MurffTexas Supreme Court· 1981-04-29· cited 988×
- Twyman v. TwymanTexas Supreme Court· 1993-05-05· cited 701×
- Sax v. VottelerTexas Supreme Court· 1983-04-06· cited 567×
- Schlueter v. SchlueterTexas Supreme Court· 1998-10-15· cited 346×
- Smith v. DavisTexas Supreme Court· 1968-04-03· cited 317×
- State v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court· 1960-01-06· cited 240×
- Vannerson v. VannersonTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1993-06-03· cited 214×
- Reagan v. VaughnTexas Supreme Court· 1991-03-06· cited 213×
- Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court· 1919-03-03· cited 194×
- Enron Corp. v. Spring Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court· 1996-05-10· cited 112×
- McCulloch v. Fox & Jacobs, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1985-07-15· cited 73×
- In Re HinterlongCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2003-07-03· cited 66×
- Stites v. GillumCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-04-28· cited 43×
- State v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1958-12-17· cited 38×
- in the Interest of L. L. and T. Y., ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2001-11-14· cited 24×
- Felsenthal v. McMillanTexas Supreme Court· 1973-03-28· cited 22×
- Andress v. MacGregor Medical Ass'nTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1999-10-28· cited 12×
- Williams v. Razor Enterprises, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2002-01-09· cited 11×
- Motorola, Inc. v. Tarrant County Appraisal DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1998-10-22· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.