Skip to main content

Smith v. Smith

Citations

  • 535 P.2d 1109
  • 56 Haw. 295
  • 1975 Haw. LEXIS 99

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing as a general principle of common law that a divorce court in one state cannot affect title to real property in another state
  • by an in personam decree, California divorce court with proper jurisdiction has power to compel conveyance of community property located in North Dakota
  • by an in personam decree, California divorce court with proper jurisdiction has power to compel conveyance of community property located in North Dakota
  • “We are in accord with the common law rule that the right to rent to accrue on a lease for the use and occupancy of real property is an incorporeal hereditament and is incident to an estate in land, the transfer of which is a transfer of an interest in realty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Kobayashi, Ogata, Menor, Kato

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.